<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby and mysqlplus select() deadlock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/</link>
	<description>pronounced &#34;coder&#34; not &#34;code err&#34; (extended r optional)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: coderrr</title>
		<link>http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>coderrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=456#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>Yea both those unsynchronized &#124;&#124;=&#039;s could be it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea both those unsynchronized ||=&#8217;s could be it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=456#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>I am wondering if the problem was that there was no concurrency lock around the assignment to @sockets ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering if the problem was that there was no concurrency lock around the assignment to @sockets ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MySQL vs PostgreSQL в ActiveRecord &#124; Uniвсячина</title>
		<link>http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>MySQL vs PostgreSQL в ActiveRecord &#124; Uniвсячина</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=456#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>[...] о такой поделке, как драйвер MySqlPlus. Но лично мне, как-то ссыкотно его запускать на [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] о такой поделке, как драйвер MySqlPlus. Но лично мне, как-то ссыкотно его запускать на [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=456#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>yeah mysqlplus will compile on 1.9. 
I was wondering more of the
remove_bad_fds
stuff is necessary for 1.9

I almost wonder if, like Python, the select function should raise on the thread that passed it a bad descriptor.

Yeah windows is definitely the step child of Ruby land, though I hear jruby actually runs on it with reasonable speed :)
-=r</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah mysqlplus will compile on 1.9.<br />
I was wondering more of the<br />
remove_bad_fds<br />
stuff is necessary for 1.9</p>
<p>I almost wonder if, like Python, the select function should raise on the thread that passed it a bad descriptor.</p>
<p>Yeah windows is definitely the step child of Ruby land, though I hear jruby actually runs on it with reasonable speed :)<br />
-=r</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coderrr</title>
		<link>http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>coderrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=456#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t tried on 1.9, is mysqlplus 1.9 compat?

Windows? lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t tried on 1.9, is mysqlplus 1.9 compat?</p>
<p>Windows? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/#comment-1159</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=456#comment-1159</guid>
		<description>does 1.9 have this bug? Does the patch work on windoze :) ?
-=r</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does 1.9 have this bug? Does the patch work on windoze :) ?<br />
-=r</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger</title>
		<link>http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=456#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>k I updated it to default to the c_async_query as you described.  Let me know if it doesn&#039;t work.

I&#039;d recommend the bug listed be submitted to ruby-core, too :)

-=r</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>k I updated it to default to the c_async_query as you described.  Let me know if it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d recommend the bug listed be submitted to ruby-core, too :)</p>
<p>-=r</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ActiveRecord threading issues and resolutions &#171; coderrr</title>
		<link>http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2009/01/11/ruby-and-mysqlplus-select-deadlock/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>ActiveRecord threading issues and resolutions &#171; coderrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=456#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>[...] I ran into a deadlock with the Ruby implementation of async_query, so use the C one instead. Then add this somewhere so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I ran into a deadlock with the Ruby implementation of async_query, so use the C one instead. Then add this somewhere so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
