Comments on: Making mixico thread safe http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/making-mixico-thread-safe/ pronounced "coder" not "code err" (extended r optional) Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:03:37 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: anateencody http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/making-mixico-thread-safe/#comment-1326 anateencody Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:35:00 +0000 http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=259#comment-1326 I'm the only one in this world. Can please someone join me in this life? Or maybe death... I’m the only one in this world. Can please someone join me in this life? Or maybe death…

]]> By: intiltwernSpecrem http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/making-mixico-thread-safe/#comment-1139 intiltwernSpecrem Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:44:15 +0000 http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=259#comment-1139 bssydosirndcltpuwell, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how's life? hope it's introduce branch ;) bssydosirndcltpuwell, hi admin adn people nice forum indeed. how’s life? hope it’s introduce branch ;)

]]> By: Dupping Our Way Out of Instance Eval? « Like Dream of Banister Fiend http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/making-mixico-thread-safe/#comment-1134 Dupping Our Way Out of Instance Eval? « Like Dream of Banister Fiend Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:14:06 +0000 http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=259#comment-1134 [...] solution to the thread-safety issue was discovered by coderrr (http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/making-mixico-thread-safe/). His solution was to duplicate the binding of the block and perform the mix_eval on the [...] [...] solution to the thread-safety issue was discovered by coderrr (http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/making-mixico-thread-safe/). His solution was to duplicate the binding of the block and perform the mix_eval on the [...]

]]> By: coderrr http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/making-mixico-thread-safe/#comment-813 coderrr Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:15:59 +0000 http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=259#comment-813 yea, good point! if you store self and use it later... things will get relaly weird! yea, good point! if you store self and use it later… things will get relaly weird!

]]> By: Victor Costan http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/making-mixico-thread-safe/#comment-812 Victor Costan Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:34:55 +0000 http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=259#comment-812 Nice work! Quick question -- if the block stores the object somewhere and tries to use it later, it'll have a very nasty surprise, right? Nice work!

Quick question — if the block stores the object somewhere and tries to use it later, it’ll have a very nasty surprise, right?

]]> By: banisterfiend http://coderrr.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/making-mixico-thread-safe/#comment-810 banisterfiend Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:21:30 +0000 http://coderrr.wordpress.com/?p=259#comment-810 very nice write-up! though im pretty sure you can even correct the pathological case (modifying methods on the singleton of the object) by redirecting the tables for the dup'd singleton too; just hope the singleton doesn't itself have a singleton :) (but even if it does you can repeat the process :) very nice write-up! though im pretty sure you can even correct the pathological case (modifying methods on the singleton of the object) by redirecting the tables for the dup’d singleton too; just hope the singleton doesn’t itself have a singleton :) (but even if it does you can repeat the process :)

]]>